Skip to main content
LATEST George W. Bush’s 9/11 Portraits Are the Strangest Presidential Afterlife Yet Did Giuliani and Mamdani Just Reset New York’s Political Body Language? A Silent WeChat Worm Raises Fresh Alarm Over Messaging Security Doctor Doom Praises Seattle’s Camera State in a Strange Little Civic Moment Apple’s iPhone Duo Pushes Foldables Into the Mainstream at $1,999
Power

Did Giuliani and Mamdani Just Reset New York’s Political Body Language?

Christina Hill
Christina Hill Staff Writer ·
10 min read
Did Giuliani and Mamdani Just Reset New York’s Political Body Language?

A handshake nobody had on the bingo card

At Friday’s ceremony in Lower Manhattan, the 25th anniversary of the Sept. 11 attacks was supposed to be about remembrance, ritual and the slow, careful choreography of grief. Then Rudy Giuliani and Zohran Mamdani crossed paths and did the thing nobody expected: they shook hands. Giuliani even offered a brief prayer over the exchange, a tiny gesture that landed with outsized force because of everything that came before it.

The weird part wasn’t just that the two men acknowledged each other. It was that they did it after a stretch of real hostility. Giuliani had recently gone on a sharp anti-Muslim rant aimed at Mamdani, who’s New York’s incoming mayor and the city’s first Muslim mayor-elect. That history hung over the moment like a bad smudge on a camera lens. So when the greeting happened, it didn’t read as ordinary civility. It read as an interruption.

In politics, a handshake can be a form of speech, especially when everyone in the room knows the last thing said was ugly.

That’s why the clip immediately became a body-language story instead of a simple protocol story. The question wasn’t whether they exchanged pleasantries. It was what the posture said. Who leaned in first? Who kept it short? And who looked caught off guard?, who looked steady. Public life gets reduced to these tiny physical tells all the time, but here the reading was almost unavoidable. The whole scene lasted seconds, yet it carried the weight of a much longer argument.

The setting made it stranger, too. This was a memorial service, not a campaign stop or a courthouse corridor where rivals can pretend they stumbled into each other. Everyone was supposed to be on the same emotional register for a few hours. Giuliani, once the mayor who became a symbol of the city after the attacks and Mamdani, the man set to take over City Hall, ended up sharing a frame on a day already loaded with memory and protocol. That alone would’ve attracted attention. Add the prayer, and the moment turned into something closer to a public reset button.

Maybe that’s too generous. A handshake is still a handshake, not a peace treaty. But optics matter, and New York politics is built on optics almost as much as it’s on policy. A single greeting can be read as forgiveness, calculation, theater, or simple survival. In this case, all four readings have some claim to them. Giuliani didn’t suddenly become Mamdani’s fan. Mamdani didn’t need to respond as if the past few weeks never happened. What changed was the frame around them: for one morning, the city’s oldest wounds pushed the usual squabbling into the background.

That’s the question the handshake leaves hanging. Did the memorial briefly reset the city’s political posture, or did it just force two very different men to stand still long enough for the cameras to catch a rare moment of restraint? New York has a habit of making room for both answers at once. The answer may show up later in policy fights, in mayoral habits, or in the next time these two are in the same room. For now, the image’s enough: Giuliani, Mamdani, one handshake, one quick prayer, and a city watching to see whether the gesture meant anything beyond the frame.

At Ground Zero, ritual drowned out the usual noise

By the time the ceremony settled in at the National September 11 Memorial & Museum, the day had already been stripped down to its barest pieces: names, pauses, and the kind of silence that makes even a crowded plaza feel hushed. The program ran as a long reading of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the attacks, with the moments of rupture from that morning built into the structure itself. The first plane. The second. The collapse of the towers. The attack on the Pentagon. Flight 93. Each pause landed like a cue everyone in the place had been waiting for, even if nobody wanted to be the one to break the quiet.

That format mattered because it pushed the elected officials out of the center. They were there, of course, but mostly as witnesses rather than performers. The families led the remembrance. They stepped up to the microphones, read names and carried the weight of the ceremony in a way that no speech from City Hall or Washington could really match. In a city that usually runs on volume, posture and a fair amount of political theater, this one worked because it refused all that. It was built around memory, not messaging.

At Ground Zero, the names did the talking, and everyone else was there to listen.

Mayor Mamdani stayed afterward to speak with relatives and pose for photos, which fit the tone of the day more than any polished public statement would have. That stretch after the formal program can tell you a lot about these gatherings. The cameras thin out, the choreography loosens, and people who came in as public figures are left standing with families who have carried this date for a quarter century. A handshake can grab the headlines, sure, but these quieter minutes are where the memorial actually lives.

The guest list also gave the ceremony a very particular political shape. Most living presidents came. So did most living New York mayors. That alone made the gathering feel like one of those rare civic rituals where the usual chain of command shows up and, for a few hours, accepts a supporting role. Donald Trump didn’t attend. Eric Adams was absent as well. Their no-shows mattered in the same way absences always do in New York politics: not as a speech, but as a blank space people notice immediately.

The city had already signaled that Sept. 11 would be treated as a Day of Remembrance, and the ceremony matched that framing almost beat for beat. There were no long stretches for partisan remarks, no attempt to turn the day into a stump speech with a better wardrobe. The structure did the work. Read the names. Pause. Remember the times. Pause again. Let the crowd absorb what it was hearing. It sounds simple, almost stubbornly so, but simplicity was the point.

But the restraint showed up in the small things too. People didn’t fill the space with chatter between readings. The pauses were allowed to breathe. Even the body language around the memorial seemed to adjust itself to the occasion. Shoulders dropped, and voices lowered. Conversations, when they happened, stayed brief. If politics was present, it wore a visitor badge.

That’s part of why the moment with Mamdani and Giuliani landed so hard later in the day. Inside the ceremony, nobody could really hold onto the usual script for long. It looks like, the memorial pulled everyone back into the same emotional register, whether they arrived as officeholders, family members, or onlookers trying to understand the strange chemistry of power and politics in New York. A memorial of this kind doesn’t erase disagreements. It just makes them harder to perform for a few hours.

And maybe that was the closest thing to consensus available. The day didn’t ask people to agree on policy, ideology, or even temperament. It asked them to stand in a place shaped by loss and listen to the names of the dead without interrupting the rhythm of remembrance. That can feel almost old-fashioned in a city that lives on noise, but it also explains why the afternoon’s interpersonal drama never fully took over the story. The ceremony had already set the terms.

For a few hours, the room belonged to the families. The officials drifted around the edges, the cameras caught what they could, and the city did what cities do on dates like this: it tried to hold grief without dressing it up. After that, the handshakes and side conversations could do their work in the headlines. At Ground Zero itself, the script stayed mercifully plain.

The pressure campaign before the ceremony

Even before the names were done being read, Zohran Mamdani was already being treated like the problem. In the days before Friday’s 9/11 memorial in Lower Manhattan, critics pushed him to stay away, with the attacks aimed at two familiar places: his Muslim faith and his link to streamer Hasan Piker, who once said America “deserved” 9/11. That’s a grim way to turn a solemn anniversary into a loyalty test, and it made the political air around the ceremony feel stale before anyone had even taken a seat.

When a memorial becomes a stress test for everyone’s politics, even a simple greeting can look like a headline.

The official setting was built for remembrance, not performative outrage. The 9/11 Memorial & Museum marked the 25th anniversary with its annual ceremony, and the day was supposed to be about families, names, and the long pause New York still takes every September. But the argument over Mamdani’s presence had already spilled out of the usual corners of New York politics and into something nastier. Some of it was the old reflex of turning religion into suspicion. Some of it was raw election-era score settling. All of it made his attendance look, to certain people, like a provocation instead of basic civic manners.

Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman took the ugliness a step further, urging first responders to turn their backs on Mamdani if he showed up. That was always going to read as theater, the kind that gets applause from one lane of the internet and eye rolls everywhere else. It also ran straight into the plain fact that most New Yorkers weren’t buying the boycott fantasy. Polling before the ceremony showed a clear majority thought Mamdani should attend anyway. People may disagree about him, loudly and often, but skipping the 25th anniversary ceremony would’ve handed his critics the exact spectacle they wanted.

The whole thing had the feel of a room where everyone arrived with a separate grievance tucked under their arm. New York politics has never lacked for that. Still, Friday’s guest list managed to feel unusually crowded with old battles. Interesting. Bill de Blasio and Andrew Cuomo were seen chatting, then hugging, which is the sort of image that makes even seasoned political reporters blink twice. If you needed proof that the city can still produce strange combinations in one public place, there it was: two men who spent years sniping at each other suddenly acting like they’d bumped into one another at a wedding buffet.

JD Vance also moved through the crowd, and the sight of him making his way past Joe Biden and Barack Obama had its own odd, almost comic symmetry. One room, a few decades of Democratic and Republican hostility, a lot of dark suits. The ceremony itself stayed disciplined, but the edges of the gathering were full of little collisions like that, reminders that a 9/11 memorial in New York can never be just a memorial. It’s also a gathering of rivals who have to behave themselves for a few hours.

Even the smallest moments got pulled into the partisan machine. When chatter spread that Mamdani and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were laughing together, an aide publicly denied it. That sounds trivial until you remember how fast a tiny gesture can get turned into a whole narrative when the room is already primed for suspicion. A smile becomes mockery. A laugh becomes disrespect. And a quiet exchange becomes a viral theory by lunch.

That was the atmosphere surrounding Mamdani before he ever shook hands with Rudy Giuliani. The ceremony was meant to calm the city down, but the run-up showed how hard that’s when every move gets interpreted through New York politics, identity politics and a fresh layer of social-media paranoia. Even the basic act of showing up had to survive a preemptive pile-on.

So by the time the memorial settled into its rhythm, the real question was no longer whether Mamdani would attend. It was whether anyone could sit through a public act of mourning without trying to turn it into a verdict on him. That tension followed him into the ceremony, and it’s what gave the later handshake its strange charge.

A truce in the frame, not a reset in the fight

By the time the ceremony wound down at Ground Zero, a few officials were trying to read the morning as a civic reset, if only for the length of a memorial service. Kathy Hochul put that idea in plain terms when she talked about common humanity, the kind of phrase politicians reach for when the city’s spent too long talking past itself. In the best possible light, that’s what the Friday gathering offered: a brief return to shared rules, shared grief and shared silence, even for people who had spent the week throwing elbows in public.

The handshake changed the photo, not the fight.

That’s why the Giuliani-Mamdani exchange landed so hard. It wasn’t just about two men deciding to be polite for a second. What stands out: it was about body language in a room that had already been loaded with tension, where every glance, pause and hand movement got read like a dispatch from City Hall. Giuliani’s prayer for Mamdani gave the moment a strange, almost disarming texture. Archbishop Ronald Hicks later framed that gesture as a very Christian move, the sort of thing faith asks of people even when they disagree with them, maybe especially then. Whether everyone saw it that way is another matter, of course, but the gesture did what gestures often do in public life: it said more than the prepared remarks ever could.

Andrew Cuomo, who was also present, pulled the conversation back toward harder ground. For him, Sept. 11 has no museum-glass distance to it. He warned that the threat remains active, pointing to Iran and to antisemitism as live dangers rather than dusty leftovers from another era. That’s the part of the day that can get lost when the cameras fixate on who shook hands with whom. The Ground Zero ceremony may run on ritual, but the politics around it never really leave the room. They keep circling.

Outside the memorial, the atmosphere was uglier and much less polished. Far-right factions showed up with dueling demonstrations, and the slogans were exactly as ugly as you’d expect from people who think a memorial is a good place for performance politics. Anti-Muslim chants mixed with antisemitic signs. It was a grim reminder that the city’s fractures don’t sit politely in the background waiting for everyone to finish the ceremony. They show up early, carry signs and try to steal the frame.

That contrast, in the end, may be the real story. Inside, a memorial service drew officials, families and faith leaders into a shared register for a few hours. Outside, the same old hostility kept muttering away. So yes, the handshake altered the political optics for the day. It gave the cameras a cleaner image and the room a thinner slice of civility than anyone might’ve expected. But it didn’t erase the lines running through New York politics, and it certainly didn’t make the next argument any less likely. The city can hold a truce for a morning. For the fight, it’s still there when everyone walks back into it.

Newsletter

Stay in the loop

Join our newsletter and get resources, curated content, and inspiration delivered straight to your inbox.